{"id":389,"date":"2015-10-01T16:57:12","date_gmt":"2015-10-01T20:57:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.eprup.com\/ica\/?p=389"},"modified":"2023-06-14T04:46:02","modified_gmt":"2023-06-14T08:46:02","slug":"yet-another-perspective-on-e-commerce-in-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.icainstitute.org\/publications\/yet-another-perspective-on-e-commerce-in-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Yet another perspective on e-Commerce in India"},"content":{"rendered":"

There is no gainsaying the fact that the e-commerce market in India is growing at a frenetic pace, a boundless excitement with new ideas and, it seems, a bottomless supply of VC funds. The Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) rules \u2013 Indian government does not allow FDI in online retail companies that own inventory and sell directly to consumers \u2013 has compelled the largest companies such as Flipkart, Snapdeal and even Amazon in India to pivot to a marketplace (connecting sellers to end consumers) model.<\/p>\n

Part 1<\/h3>\n

Having returned from a recent trip to India (3rd in the past year), all of which included conversations with retailers, logistics firms and small business, I am adding my perspective to the flood of opinions and information available on the market, players, challenges and opportunities.<\/p>\n

There is no gainsaying the fact that the e-commerce market in India is growing at a frenetic pace, a boundless excitement with new ideas and, it seems, a bottomless supply of VC funds. The Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) rules \u2013 Indian government does not allow FDI in online retail companies that own inventory and sell directly to consumers \u2013 has compelled the largest companies such as Flipkart, Snapdeal and even Amazon in India to pivot to a marketplace (connecting sellers to end consumers) model.<\/p>\n

While, it is reported, the current government is evaluating whether FDI in ecommerce provides an alternative entry point for foreign multi-brand retailers, it has maintained the previous government\u2019s decision to allow 51% FDI in multi-brand retail. If the Indian government wants to, as it claims, make it easy to do business in India and grow at a faster pace than China, then perhaps a uniform policy with 100% FDI on and offline should be welcomed. As for the brick and mortar stores, fighting the online retail tsunami is futile, they should revamp their strategy to be multi-channel leaders. Short term, the impact to mom and pop stores can be mitigated by being part of the ecommerce supply chain.<\/p>\n

FDI is not the primary barrier to e-commerce growth in India, the disparate state tax laws, returning goods at a higher rate than worldwide averages, and the Indian shopper\u2019s brick and mortar mentality of bargaining that has transcended to the web for discounts and promotion, burdening online retailers with losses, are far greater barriers to overcome.<\/p>\n

The Indian consumer parallels the American consumer more closely than any other nation in Asia but is at the receiving end of onerous regulations. At a macro level, what will drive growth is a reduction in the cost of goods sold, which in turn will be driven by infrastructure, regulatory and tax changes (land, labor and general sales tax). Online commerce will not grow unless the underlying macro factors which impact logistics costs are addressed. An argument can be made that one of the reasons the US became an economic behemoth is because of its significant reduction in logistics costs as a percentage of GDP. For India to be an economic powerhouse it is imperative that this is resolved, a collateral benefit of which is the growth of interstate business \u2013 online or B2B.<\/p>\n

Part 2<\/h3>\n

As I start typing this trip report on online retailers in India, the festival season has started and the retailers expect between 3 to 10 times normal volume. Wishing the entire Indian retail industry, a very happy Dussehra – Diwali season. Not unlike the U.S, most retailers expect to generate a majority of their sales and profits during this \u201cpeak\u201d season. While the brick and mortar stores may look forward to some profit, I suspect the online retailers \u2014 at least the most popular ones \u2014 will not. Instead they will expect to minimize the hemorrhaging of VC money.<\/p>\n

Online shopping in India has grown exponentially since last \u201cpeak\u201d and the online retailers have been preparing for this since the last one ended, which to a certain extent, disappointingly in terms of technology and service. My belief \u2014 this will be borne out when the numbers come out mid November \u2013 is that growth will come from not just large city clusters but from second and third tier cities teeming with consumers who have joined or joining the online shopping revolution. The market has expanded considerably the past year, thanks in part to the venture funded marketing and advertising by the large online retailers. Besides the big three \u2013 Flipkart, Snapdeal and Amazon \u2013 Paytm, with investment from Alibaba has entered the marketplace model and will be experiencing their first \u201cpeak\u201d. I am certain that the focus for most online retailers is the front end shopping experience \u2014 with a broad spectrum of suppliers across several categories \u2014 with limited attention, until I saw change on this trip, to the overall experience of which logistics is an integral part. While I was in India a few weeks back, I did an unscientific survey by talking to suppliers who use the three largest players about their experience on the process and also placing orders from them to understand the supplier, consumer shopping and delivery experience.<\/p>\n

From what I observed and heard,<\/p>\n